News >> Browse Articles >> Gadgets

+4

Military Wants to Go 30% Robotic by 2020

Military Wants to Go 30% Robotic by 2020

Shane McGlaun / DailyTech

August 05, 2008

‘The US military plans to use robots more than ever.’ -

Science fiction fans raised on a steady diet of Terminator and Star Wars films have very specific ideas about what a robot on the battlefield would look like. The reality of military robots is that all of them require a human to operate, often with a joystick and a computer.

As far as the military is concerned, anything from an autonomous vehicle to a remote controlled observation drone could be considered a robot. The U.S. Military is using robots at an ever increasing pace for all sorts of tasks. One of the most common military robots is the iRobot PackBot. The PackBot can be configured for different uses including bomb detection. Another war robot called the SWORD can actually carry weapons into battle, though the SWORD has not been deployed yet at this time.

A pair of researchers from Washington University in St. Louis – Doug Few and Bill Smart – say that the military goal is to have approximately 30% of the Army comprised of robots by 2020. Smart says, “When the military says ‘robot’ they mean everything from self-driving trucks up to what you would conventionally think of as a robot. You would more accurately call them autonomous systems rather than robots.”

The researchers and other supporters of robots in the military point out that all of the robots currently in service are teleoperated by people remotely. The reason to keep people controlling the robots rather than making the totally autonomous is so that the human operator has to make the decision and analyze the situation before shots are fired. This is to prevent any accidental shootings attributed to a robot and help eliminate the fear that robots could commit war crimes.

Smart says, “It’s a chain of command thing. You don’t want to give autonomy to a weapons delivery system. You want to have a human hit the button. You don’t want the robot to make the wrong decision. You want to have a human to make all of the important decisions.”

Few is also working on the relationship between the human operator and the robot in an attempt to make controlling the robot more natural and easy. Being able to control the robot easily and keep eyes on the environment in a war zone is paramount to operator safety.

One method Few is working on to make controlling robots more natural is integrating the Nintendo Wii motion controller into the operating system. This allows the robot to be controlled by the operator without the need for a laptop or screen and allows the soldier to operate the robot and still watch his environment for the enemy.

Smart explains, “We forget that when we’re controlling robots in the lab it’s really pretty safe and no one’s trying to kill us. But if you are in a war zone and you’re hunched over a laptop, that’s not a good place to be. You want to be able to use your eyes in one place and use your hand to control the robot without tying up all of your attention.”

While viewing an iRobot PackBot destroyed in combat after defusing a bomb, Few says he came to a realization. “When I stood there and looked at that PackBot, I realized that if that robot hadn’t been there, it would have been some kid,” said Few. Replacing the human in some of the most dangerous tasks on the battlefield – like defusing bombs – is one of the best uses for military robots in many eyes.

© 2008, DailyTech


+4
  • Photo_user_blank_big

    santhanakrishnan

    3 months ago

    2 comments

    fjh

  • Capav_max50

    scastle

    3 months ago

    58 comments

    There will always have to be men on the ground to occupy territory. I think anything that helps save lives is a good thing. I could see them being more functional in support rolls. As long as we have “skin” in the game then there is a reason for alternatives.

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    AndrewSoftwareGuy

    3 months ago

    18 comments

    We should do away with war, but I dont think that is going to happen any time soon. Robots after all are made to save humans from harm. All machinery as well as robots are also made to increase output of work; productivity. Thats sad we are getting way to effecient at killing one another :(

  • Img_0836_max50

    redskinsss05

    3 months ago

    30 comments

    Use more robots, save more human being at war.

  • N641121958_6770_max50

    edahl

    3 months ago

    130 comments

    Anybody remember Asimov's "The Feeling of Power"? http://www.themathlab.com/writings/short%20stories/feeling.htm

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    yamaj615

    3 months ago

    2 comments

    good point jamesb344, but i still think the increase in robotic usage will be advantageous.

  • Java_starting_max50

    DanielThornton

    3 months ago

    4 comments

    But then, if there are only robots, and no risk of human casualty, it may truly be a game.

  • Lukie_22_max50

    dremtIT

    3 months ago

    4 comments

    I already use my irobot to defuse bombs and other FUN WAR GAME STUFF thank you please keep me up to date on great FUN WAR GAME articles and technology.

    P.S. i have nver been devistated playing war from home.

  • Jim_20080806_max50

    jamesb344

    3 months ago

    2 comments

    My only concern is that people will treat war like a video game and want to keep it up for the thrill. I don't want kids of any nation to die in war, but I don't want war to become "fun" either. People must realize that war is devastating and must be avoided at all cost. Of course the enemy must also realize that we are not going to give in just because we don't want our children, or their children, to die. It is a fine line we cross here, do we make war "easy" or bloody? And if we do make it easy how do we stop the war when it is no longer necessary? The ones making the decisions must not make war a game.

  • Photo_user_banned_big

    Chrisdafrenchie

    3 months ago

    248 comments

    IRAN 2020

What's the Scoop?

Post a link to something interesting from another site, or submit your own original writing for the InsideTech community to read.

Report News Here

Recent Activity

Nm_max30
nmcclaran gave a thumbs up to The Post "Finish the sentence", 6 minutes ago.
Nm_max30
nmcclaran posted in: "Finish the sentence", 6 minutes ago.
Dsc00384_max30
Phreadd commented on: "Matthew Bjerre", 6 minutes ago.
Photo_user_blank_big
david_gray received the quiz result of "Average Chance at Scholarships", 10 minutes ago.
Img_2393_max30
frsilva gave a thumbs up to The Article "Flawed AVG antivirus update cripples Windows XP PCs", 10 minutes ago.